Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
Coventry City Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 149 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

BANNER BROOK PARK NO.2

reference
0325/T006
name
BANNER BROOK PARK NO.2
tree-preservation-order

undefined

0325
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.597953 52.407822)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.597878 52.407822,-1.597878 52.407828,-1.597884 52.407842,-1.597894 52.407852,-1.597912 52.407862,-1.597924 52.407866,-1.597942 52.407869,-1.597966 52.407869,-1.597992 52.407863,-1.598016 52.407849,-1.598025 52.407838,-1.598029 52.407827,-1.598029 52.407818,-1.598025 52.407806,-1.598011 52.407791,-1.597989 52.407780,-1.597962 52.407775,-1.597943 52.407775,-1.597929 52.407777,-1.597912 52.407782,-1.597901 52.407788,-1.597892 52.407794,-1.597881 52.407807,-1.597878 52.407816,-1.597878 52.407822)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-14
start-date
2005-07-07
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The Tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

How to improve Coventry City Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL